Our lives are fucked. Earth is fucked. Do you want to know why? Do you want to know the beginning of how to improve on them until they're unrecognizable to what they are now? A tiny bit of the bare minimum of that, is in the song titles.

Expansion of the theme:

*** These general ideas are not commonly shared, so I don't want people thinking they originated from me. I'm just explaining the very basics of the ideas, trying to make them as clear as possible in my own way. Credit to the geniuses at the end. ***

Have no faith or belief in any ideas of objective reality; only strive for *knowledge* through the hard work of personal free critical thinking. No faith in the scientific materialists of the mainstream enterprises. Have no faith in what I am presenting to you!

Nobody invents the fundamental nature of existence; it is only discovered. It is never quick and easy to discover and recognize the ultimate truth as being the ultimate truth. Bits and pieces of the truth are scattered throughout the world's societies. Some of those pieces of objective truth came through intuition from the unconscious part of the mind which eternally carries the ultimate truth in its entirety. Amongst the pieces of truth are a myriad of lies born out of innocent ignorance and also narcissistic power-hungry intent to control societies. Can all of humanity piece the objective truths together into one coherent picture and transcend this human condition into which we evolved? Will the Working Class continue to suffer? Will we all die due to stupidity?

Why are empirical-only scientists maximally hopeless at explaining in seamless detail—no gaps left unfilled—the reason why the universe and all of us are here in the first place? Because those scientists are one-sided.

I'll try to give a simple and intuitive explanation of what I mean by "one-sided:" As you have certainly experienced throughout your life, we have positive and negative experiences. Both of these phenomena are experiential expressions of the mathematical basis of reality (the source code for everything.) Experiences are numeral energy patterns which are created by many little logical points (dots) that move in various ways, forming an energetic code (patterns.) A loose metaphor: Think of the fact that videogames are experiences generated by a code that's powered by electricity (energy.)
The movement of the logical points is what we know as "energy." Movement is energy, and energy is movement. Energy naturally goes through a transformation process which creates one side of the energy to become visible to the eye. This transformation allows you to be able to see and sense objects around you. An object that you might be looking at, is your ceiling that's starting to cave-in while leaking, due to a water problem above. That's something negative; negativity is a natural consequence of the base nature of reality. Positivity and negativity are part of the source code of everything in existence. The source is necessarily eternal by its own mandatory laws of positivity and negativity which it cannot destroy. You'll eventually see why.

So, what I've explained means that the mathematical/logical principles on which the universe is built, have opposite forces/values. The opposites make the code complete, balanced, and able to function efficiently. These opposites of positivity and negativity are what makes all movement possible. These opposites are how we are able to think about things; our ability to think, contains these opposites. Our ability to think is only possible because of the existence of motion (motion = doing something.) There must exist a grand singular source of motion. This grand source must be the opposite in its nature to the realm of our sensory experiences (due to the mathematical law of opposites.) It is logically mandatory for the source to be invisible to your eyes. Remember, we are talking about the *objective* nature of the source of all experiences that have happened and will happen in the future. There must be basic rules for everything in order for anything to happen in the first place.


If someone has an idea of something that's true for everybody in existence, and another person feels uncomfortable about it and doesn't prefer it being the truth because it doesn't align with their current beliefs, therefore, they never do serious and thorough critical thinking about the idea – is that second person mentioned, having an objective mindset, or, having a subjective mindset?
Feelings and preferences are subjective on the base level, and they constantly change. Strictly pure objective truth can never change its base functionality and have you experience your life the same way as you always have. If the base functionality of existence did change, even a little bit, it would start a domino effect, causing absolutely irrational absurdities to happen at the speed of light – everything in the universe would be unstable because the base code's method of operation would be imbalanced and imperfect. Everything on our planet and in the universe would be morphing in every way at the speed of light, making it unlivable. Every living being in the universe would be physically shredded, bodies dying and suddenly coming back to life 300 times in 1 second, and the universe would crash, causing the *permanent death* of our minds. Hopefully you will realize that it's a logical impossibility for such a crisis to ever occur.

Mathematics that represent the base nature of reality (ontological mathematics) is purely rational, therefore, is a complete set, eternally stable, and self-reliant. It's an eternal cycle of complete stability that doesn't need to rely on anything outside of itself in order for it to function.

When I'm referring to mathematics and numbers being the source code of the universe, I'm not referring to any kind of visual representation, meaning I'm not talking about visual markings that humans use, such as writing "0 1 2 3," and those being displayed somewhere in the universe and are running things. I'm actually talking about pure Thought, Reason, and Logic. All of the visual markings related to mathematics that humans make, are markings that represent pre-existing laws that reside in the mind.

Only reason, logic, and an objective mindset are needed to understand the core of existence; they are to be used as a mental filter when doing so – this is how you can get right down to the absolute truth, bypassing—via recognizing—all that is bullshit.

Feelings, intuitions, and preferences at the forefront of your life, have the greatest potential to steer you everywhere else but to the objective truth of life itself. It's even worse if you stubbornly or fearfully stay faithful in your preferred objective view for the rest of your life while knowing there's opposing evidence and ideas out there, and you don't take them seriously, or you pretend to take them seriously, but you secretly or subconsciously have a closed mind, while saying you have an open mind anyway. Possibly unbeknownst to you, your mind being closed, stems from fear of losing the comfort that your belief gives you, and being rejected by your social group.


Opposites:

Positive One (+1) implies the existence of Negative One (-1)
There must be a contrast in order for Positive One to make sense. How can there be a Positive One if there's no Negative One? Positive implies Negative. The Negative One must be in existence, or else you could never refer to Positive One.
Note, "positive one" is the same as only saying "one."

In this following thought experiment, in order to make things as simple and clear as possible, we are putting our mental focus completely in a realm that is all about one apple; nothing else but you, *one apple,* and your *inventory* exist in this realm:

If you grab and put the apple into your inventory, that means you started with negative apple. "Negative apple" already existed there in your inventory before you put the actual apple in. You needed the contrast of Negative and Positive in order for your action to make sense. This means that you need negativity in order to have a very simple experience such as this. Negativity and positivity always exist together in unified and perfectly balanced harmony on the base level of existence. These opposites get expressed in various ways in the universe, so that we may have the ultimate collective experience.

The existence of *void* is a law. The existence of the *opposite of void* is a law. Can you hold the bare Law of Void in your hand and show it to someone without saying anything to them and have them definitely know that you're supposed to be holding the Law of Void? We need to communicate ideas; our ability to think must come first, before any communication of ideas can happen – *thinking* is the base (notice I didn't say the body or brain comes first.) The Law of Void can only be recognized as being real by thinking rationally, as you've just done with the apple.

All laws for society which were created by humanity, came from thinking. If all of humanity died, their societal laws would die with them – before and after the death, societies on another planet would have differing societal laws. After the death of humanity, would the basic law of 1 + 1 = 2 (an object + an object = 2 objects) still be true for every planet in the universe? Which *type* of law is starting to seem objective and eternal?

Ignoring the body and brain for now.

• The societal laws were *thought* and then communicated.

• The Law of Void and Law of Opposites are only recognized as existing in reality by rationally *thinking* about them.

Societal laws are *subjective* to one society. Laws that are realized as already existing before you thought about them, go beyond the one society.

If both of these types of laws involve thinking, and one of the types are objectively true, and the objective one is realized as pre-existing, doesn't that mean that the objectively true laws are superior and our ability to think is special? Why can our thinking reveal pre-existing objective laws at all? Why does it seem like thinking lets us recognize that the laws are objectively true without us going over to another planet to test it? This is very simple stuff; you shouldn't have to. Is *rational thought* special? Is *rational thought* objectively true?

Have you realized the void?



We need contrast. We need to be able to understand what is what. If we see a balloon traveling through the air, how are we able to see that it's moving at all? Because, there's objects around it, or markings on the wall behind it – we need contrast. Same for ontological (reality) mathematics; we need contrasting numbers. Contrast is how we get physical distance, meaning, *opposites* are how we get physical distance. Opposites are how we're able to move; they give all the contrast we need to accomplish such.

Why do you think there's math problems in school that contain subtraction? Those math problems in school actually exist, don't they? They're right in front of you, able to be solved, right? The problems are possible to solve in school, because negative numbers actually exist; this is why it makes sense in school, and why negative numbers are used in life and science – they were always a part of reality – they are discovered and realized, not invented.


Again, I am trying to keep the explanations simple and intuitive here.

Various tiny "blasts" of energy are what generate sensory experiences.
The basics of ontological mathematics is about numbers indicating measurement of the volume levels of blasts of energy. There are both small and big blasts. Each blast has its own rank-number which indicates its power level. Every blast of energy is a positive number. Whenever there's no blast of energy, that's a negative number (meaning, one of the little points is moving around the circle over to the negative half.) Energy is circular motion.

Every positive number implies the same negative number to exist.
Imagine a perfect circle with one end of it touching +3 and the opposite end of the circle touching -3 on the scale below:




... +5 +4 +3 +2 +1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 ...




Now, imagine a little dot traveling at a consistent pace around the perfect circle you're imagining. The energy level of that is 3. That tiny blast of sensory experience is on the positive half of the scale. That tiny bit of energy could be generating a tiny part of an atom, for example (emphasis on, "...a tiny part...".)

There's way more to the mathematical formula of flowing points than this; that was just a simple piece of it.


When you add all possible positive numbers and all possible negative numbers together, you get zero. Zero is nothingness. Zero is the net result of everything in existence. Zero is not a thing you can hold in your hand; you can only think about it. Zero is the answer, the simplest possible answer. "Small and simple" is the opposite of an insanely large and complex universe. Zero contains the volumes of energy. Zero contains the basis of our ability to think (thinking = doing something = movement.) You can never destroy nothing. How can you destroy nothing if there's nothing physical there to destroy? Zero is a part of the source of our physical reality. This means that zero and motion are both eternal; they can never be destroyed or stopped. By the law of opposites, nothingness implies the existence of something. It's mandatory for those little logical points to always exist and to always be in motion by the opposite forces.
Can you see how all of these aspects support the existence of each other? They are working together in harmony without reliance on anything external; it's a closed system of pure reason and logic.



Good and evil are natural consequences from the basic nature of our source code. They are not external higher Beings; they both are us. If you don't like the evil, overcome the evil by your own power. Don't be fucking lazy and childish, relying on an external creator God that you have faith exists because it feels comfortable, because everyone else has the faith, and because you're not wanting to be mentally or physically separated from your society due to living life differently! Step out of your mental comfort zone and critically think, if you truly care about the wellbeing of the world! Everything begins with the mind.



How can we know the invisible points of thought exist? By thinking about the nature of thought – metacognition – *thought* trying to understand the foundational nature of *itself.*

Why are the little logical points moving at all? Because: What would be the purpose of the opposites? Opposites imply movement, and movement implies something that moves. You simply need a smallest-possible point to be the thing that moves. A point so small, that if it got any smaller, it would cease to exist. At this small-scale extremity, the point is zero-dimensional; it's at the absolute limit of existence, but, it still has to be there in existence in order to be *something.* The point being zero-dimensional, means that it's pure logic. Think of it as excluded from being a part of all transformation processes – all types of sensory experience – we are bringing our focus down to pure logic, the simplest form of logic itself.
Why would you need something extremely complex as the base answer? We're thinking about the basis of logic here. We're thinking about thought itself. You just need the simplest tiny point to begin generating a tiny thought by its movement.

Of course, there's not just one point; we need to have a myriad of flowing points in order to generate interesting lives! We need to generate the opposite of simplicity! We don't want life to be boring, do we?

For you gamers out there who have experienced visual glitches during a video game; here's a loose metaphor to help you understand the zero-dimensional points:
Imagine one of those visual glitches where an object is going through another object, being unable to stop or push each other; they're just passing through each other and it's obvious that it's an undesired visual occurrence.
You know for a fact that those objects exist in the game because you can see them and do various things with them, but they're having zero reactive collision action with each other.

• The game objects exist and don't interact in a physical way with each other.

• The tiny invisible logical points of thought exist, and don't interact in a physical way with each other.

The zero-dimensional points cannot collide and interrupt each other's flow; they have no "hit-boxes" like objects in video games – they are pure information generators. This is how our thoughts are able to function while living together in one little zero-dimensional point (the opposite of an incredibly large and complex universe.)



On the objective base level, we, as thinking Beings, are all *always* complete and perfectly balanced sets of mathematical scales. We are units of energy, vibrations, circles, waves, and patterns – self-propelling cyclical systems of balanced reason and logic.

This is base motion that is self-sustaining, therefore rests upon nothing. Every component supports each other in a rational, harmonious, and cyclical manner, keeping everything objectively stable as you have always experienced it. What I mean by "stable" is things don't happen for no good reason. Another way to put it: Your vehicle is not unexpectedly transforming shape every minute, while your body is unexpectedly stretched a mile long by an invisible force, killing you in the process for no good reason at all. There are no miracles. If something crazy happens, there's always a rational explanation.
Everything that happens is based on our rational foundation of existence. Sometimes, we can never find the reason for why a certain thing has happened to someone; it could be very complex circumstances and we might not have the appropriate time, mental energy, or mental ability for understanding, and it might not be worth searching and pondering if you compare the situation to the larger scale of life (it might not have anything to do with discovering the fundamental nature of reality in order to become objectively smart and gain higher wisdom.)

All circumstances in our individual lives are not being controlled or determined by a greater force; we have free will in order to have the ultimate collective experience. We are in the driver's seat, individually and collectively.

We are living in a shared dream. We are living in an illusion. When you break the illusion, you see that everything is based on nothing – based on our minds which are equal to zero by nature. We are the only things in existence. We are unique individual minds comprised of many personal zero-dimensional points, all living together in one zero-dimensional point, giving ourselves illusions, forgetting and remembering, becoming absolutely pathetic, and then becoming all-powerful objectively conscious Gods.

We've been playing games with each other for eternity.

Everything is thought. Thought is transformed into a sensory experience just like when you have a private dream at night.
Your giant dream world never explodes out of your head, killing you in the process of its generation. That's because your mind-source is zero-dimensional. Your dreams that ultimately have zero dimensions to them on the base level, can never destroy your physical head with an explosion of matter by you generating them during sleep.

Knowledge is power. Lucidity is power.
When people have a lucid personal dream, they gain the power to control their dream because they've gained the knowledge that they're dreaming. It takes a lot more time, hard work, and mental evolution for us to gain the power to control collective dreams. We are all in this together.

Your brain is not your mind; your brain is a control station for your body.

There's opposite sides to everything. This Experiential Universe is the opposite side of Mind; it's the illusion of space and dimensionality. We automatically think that sensory experience is all that exists, and we ignore the nature of thought, because sensory experience is so distracting. The universe is the illusion of only matter existing.

Everything in this universe comes to an end; zero-dimensional mind cannot, because of its opposites equaling zero. The Indestructible Resultant Zero has no choice but to stay in existence infinitely, thereby, making its contents eternal. Zero gives rise to the possibility of Infinity (this is only literally true during personal pondering and realization. Every aspect of the source code has always been in existence; the aspects have no beginning.) Zero = Infinity = Infinite Life. "Coming to an end," means, transforming back into the state of no sensory experience – energy cannot come to an absolute end; it's always recycled into one form or another (the points [dots] are always implied to be in existence.)
Your personal dreams at night come to an end, they disappear, you wake up, and you're still a mind that can think. When every mind in the universe wakes up from this collective dream, this collective dream disappears and we can still think. When this collective dream that's generating your body and brain right now disappears, that's not the end of personal and collective dreams – Earthling minds will be, and other planets' minds already have been, controlling other sensory realms. We will mentally evolve to become master dream programmers. We will be able to create customized private and public sensory realms through our power of lucidity. We will continue to do so, until we have exhausted all possible positive experiences. We will have the ultimate satisfaction that we were working so hard to achieve from the very beginning of the universe.

After such a long time of being all-powerful, and experiencing everything positive, we eventually need contrast in life. Life would eventually feel absolutely horrendous if we stayed as all-powerful Gods forever. We are ontological math, and ontological math is cyclical. This is after an extremely long time, to the point of us becoming bored; we would have done everything to our hearts' content.

Before a universal cycle is generated, we are always willing to forget all of the knowledge that we have obtained. We need that contrast to make life interesting. A refreshment is needed. We do just that. We set aside our memories into the darkness. We become unconscious, begin to dream, and thus, start a brand-new and unique journey of physical and mental evolution.



When we all start dreaming, why don't we all just start having private individual dreams, why is it collective?
Because, at that point before we start dreaming, we are in perfect mental harmony with each other – there's no more division caused by objective ignorance – it's *as if* we are one mind. Like it has always been previously, one mind dreams. We shift our mental waves out of perfect completion and symmetry, causing our waves to entangle with each other in a very potent and dimensional manner, collectively generating every tiny bit of sensory experience. Thus, beginning our will to power.



How can the whole universal collective wake up?
Through the hard mental work of coming to know the ultimate truth of reality, we will eventually become lucid (conscious) within this collective dream. Every mind in existence needs to come to *know* that every mind in existence is generating the universe by our own power through our own free will. That's when the first realm (channel) of the universe disappears; we no longer need to be generating it, because we beat that stage.



Individual planets:

Before the first realm (channel) of the universe disappears, every individual planet needs to mentally evolve to be able to work together in self-optimizing harmony, giving equal opportunity for everyone to become the best that they can possibly be during every personal life cycle.

Reincarnation is a must-have, but it has nothing to do with "karma." Reincarnation is an objective filter. It helps evolution gradually move higher – to higher biological and mental levels. It's how we're able to think of ideas as complex as this now. It keeps everything flowing. Mathematics (our minds) must, at some point, complete its universal cycle (the large-scale cycle.)
We are always, in some way, striving toward completion whether we know it or not, but we also have free will, which can keep us stagnant for some time.

Reincarnation is a natural consequence of the law of opposites:
death - life
loss - gain
big - small
old - young
negative - positive

If everyone on a planet is objectively conscious (lucid,) they don't have to wait for other planets to also become conscious in order for them to level-up by moving to the second realm of the universe (a separate channel of the universe with more freedom and abilities.) If the first conscious planet had to wait for all of the rest of the planets, that would be absolutely bonkers!

This is our universal game. Can we beat the Planet level as "Earthlings?"



Having faith and belief is not knowing. Knowing the ultimate truth through personal reasoning, logic, and critical thinking is the only way for someone to become conscious. You cannot force it. Sensing, emotions, and intuition by themselves cannot get you to fundamental objective knowledge. If you've gained an idea about objective reality through your intuition, you must filter it through reason and logic; keep the rational stuff and reject the irrational. Try to piece the puzzle together.

Since the source code of reality is rational and unchanging, you must connect to it with rationality which does not change like emotions do, so you can understand its truth, so you can understand the truth about you and all of us – you need to be able to speak its language – our objective language of stability.

What does all life in existence have in common with each other?
We are all the same type of entity.
If everyone evolves into having the ability to know our source code, things like racism would end.



—————————————

A New World Order: MERITOCRACY - not a complete description:

Because we are the source code, that means we have free will – we are our own bosses – we choose what we individually do. There's no external dictators on how we should live our lives. We are either smart, dumb, or in-between. We care or we don't.

Look at the current state of the world; mental diversity has already been done. Are we mentally unified in the knowledge of objective truth and healthier harmonious wisdom? No - we are mentally separated (though, not completely, these days.) Are we still harming each other? Yes. If we learn and imitate the basic workings of an already perfect system on which our bodies are built, a system which is able to keep our bodies alive long enough for us to learn, biologically and mentally evolve, then, we can know how to create the perfect world order in which everyone on the planet can eventually fully thrive, instead of the majority needing to survive. We are *one* with this perfect system that supports the existence of life and awareness. We are our own tool. How do we grasp and use our tool efficiently? Is our source code rational and logical?

If the source code has a synthesis of perfectly balanced opposites, and is able to make a giant jumbled mess that is the universe, and also able to run biological evolution until we have the self-aware heavily-thinking animal which we call, "Human," then, we can learn the basic principles of biological evolution, and also learn the reason for why it works the way that it does. Through us knowing how the source code works, in combination with knowing how biological evolution works, we can use this knowledge to our advantage.

Biological evolution is done unconsciously. It begins by opposites clashing. The animal knows what's good and bad for it; it experiences positivity and negativity clashing in its subjective life. The species' minds learning from experiencing the effects of both opposites, causes them to evolve in order to adapt to their environment over many life cycles of that species. The resulting physical and mental evolution is a synthesis of opposites, meaning, the animal's body and mindset is the harmonious combination of positive and negative.

If something as amazing as this whole universe can be created from the balanced synthesis of opposites, then, we should synthesize all opposite ideas that we come across by filtering them through logic and reason in order for us all to become more unified in knowledge and understanding of the wide variety of ideas that we have. We have to do the hard work of recognizing and rejecting the truly bad ideas; we have to be smart and brutally honest with ourselves if we actually care about our collective wellbeing. By doing this, we will be *evolving* the current world order into a new world order where everyone could thrive in peace and harmony. We should, generally speaking, bring our opposites back together again in harmonious balance. Life is like a puzzle; the perfect coherence has been jumbled-up into ignorance and subjectivity – the ultimate division, the ultimate game.

Biological evolution operates in a meritocratic way, too. The features of animals' bodies which they have at any given point in history, have higher merit for them in that moment than anything else that is *not* those specific features, therefore, those better features have been unconsciously developed according to the types of environments in which the animals live. In other words: Those specific features that they've developed have higher merit than any other possible options. An animal's personal code detects the need for some bodily tweaking for better survival if the environment changes, so it gradually develops birth after birth.

I'm not saying that evolution in general is always perfect in every way with its merit system. We cannot forget about the equally powerful force of negativity; that potential is always present in an objectively uncontrolled environment. In this context, negative occurrences arise through ignorance, not intent. The universe began in an unconscious, therefore, ignorant state, making all of the physical interactions of life-forms from the very beginning, done through innocent ignorance, thereby, causing a chain reaction of physical events, eventually creating the planetary condition that we (Earth) experience today.

So, a first-time volcanic eruption in an area could be a negative event that causes death or makes life hard to live for insects, animals, and/or people. You wouldn't say that the inhabitants perfectly evolved to triumph over the volcano eruption and all of its aftereffects just because the volcano is in their area of living. Some things are just too drastic.

Now, stepping away from that volcano situation: Generally speaking, which individual animals have higher merit for survival? One rabbit being compared to another rabbit: One dies too early in life because it made a deadly decision. The one that survives, has the opportunity to gain more life experience, and goes-on to have offspring that's just as good or a little better than the parents. Of course, there's always the possibility of some physical retardation. This is the constant battle for higher biological and mental optimization. This is the unconscious form of meritocracy.

I have my experience with the mentality of Christian fundamentalism in which I grew-up, so, I know what I'm talking about when I say the following general statement: The majority of humanity wants to stay in the comfort zone as much as possible, especially the mental comfort zone, nowadays. For some reason, humanity has evolved to be highly emotional. They have many overly emotional reactions to various things and it builds-up to be a clusterfuck of emotional drama that totally buries logic and reason. Many people let their emotions guide them in areas of life where it's not optimal health-wise (physically and mentally.) This world's current system of physical and mental slavery is very hard on people, therefore, they want as much comfort as possible – it's a cycle. Of course, there are aspects in the world that I'm not touching on which makes things crazy. Life is very long and complex.

Many people are so caught-up with distracting their minds with entertainment and staying away from conflict. Especially conflicts like debating very important ideas that could lead to a healthier world order, which could result in no more narcissists being in power, and no more leaders being chosen based mainly on being in a certain popular family and having lots of money.

We need a meritocracy – a meritocratic world that positions people based on their talent for a specific position; the more powerful the position, the more thorough and strict should be the examination of the person's *personality* and *talent.* All parts within the system need to be managed by people who are compassionate and strict through the talent of having an objective mindset while filtering ideas through reason and logic (of course, also having the required talent for their specific societal position.)

We greatly need to take into account a society's psychology.

A bit of a refresher, said in a different way:
We must use something that is unchanging and objective to discover what is unchanging and objective about the universe. Why? Because we are obviously part of the universe and we live here. The answer is reason, logic, and eternal mathematical laws – they all go hand in hand; they are inseparable and 100% objective. They underlie all things. Simple mathematical laws are true for everyone. They are how nature operates. We are nature. Our minds are nature. Our minds are the beginning of all ideas and creation. We have always been actualizing ideas, always actualizing thoughts; it's in our nature to do so.

Back to meritocracy:
In the USA, is your citizen idiotic neighbor allowed to go and vote for who becomes president? YES. No idiots should be allowed to have any say in who becomes president! We need only people who are well-versed in politics, have open minds, can critically think, be rational, logical, and compassionate. If humanity keeps leveling-up mentally, eventually, it will get to the point where leaders will be those who are actually conscious of the mathematical foundation and teleology of the universe, making them well-versed in ontological mathematics as well as politics, giving them greater wisdom and judgment.

We need to be way more strict in politics so that we don't waste our time with fucking murderous pedophiles who run for office and try to make pedophilia legal!

We need individuals to display talents, and have others with those same talents pick the best of the best within those groups of talent, especially for a position like presidency. In other words: Talented people judging the other people who have the same talent that they themselves have, which allows for optimal judgment.

Equal opportunity for all!


That was some of the objectively conscious, therefore, more powerful form of meritocracy.

This will take a lot of time and hard work. Can we do it?... or are we too worn-down?



—————————————

The scientists who are empirical-only, are only doing tests and experiments on things they can see with their eyes, smell, taste, and feel on their skin. Since they're stuck in this simple-minded sensory science, they deny that mathematics, logic, and reason are superior to their senses, therefore, they will never do the critical thinking about mathematics being real and the driving force behind everything. They cannot comprehend how the perfectly balanced set of simple and rational mathematics can be the most important part of the universe. They say mathematics was invented by humanity, but in fact, the basic laws were discovered, not invented.



—————————————

Let's have no more religions based on illusions, ignorance, wishes, and hope! It's time for the final religion to rise – a religion of destruction – the religion of courage, honesty, hyper-reason, critical thinking, intellect, individuality, harmonious unity, knowledge, and freedom!
This is how you establish a world of genuine love and happiness. In objective reality, a God of pure love does not come first as the Christians wrongly believe. Great Love is what they want to feel so much; they are blinded by their feelings. On a worldwide scale, they are going about establishing love in a simple-minded and cult-like way.

Going around on a mission of Love and Faith in the manner that I know you Christians do, and with the intentions that I know you have, is not making the world better in the *long-run*! Do you have the eyes to see? Genuine and long-term love and happiness worldwide is a *result* from individuals *knowing* how to create the healthiest world order in which to raise our children.

Everything begins with the mind.




Written by Xaina Sarpenta (Suitcase Body.)





—————————————

Credit:

These general ideas are from the Pythagorean Illuminati. I'm referring to the real and original Illuminati – the society of hyper-rational outside-the-box thinkers who have developed Ontological Mathematics and Meritocracy since the time of Pythagoras (2,500 years ago) to now. They're not the so-called "evil rich elite Illuminati who control presidential elections and are the bosses of the presidents." That's a stupid conspiracy theory spread around by incompetent fearful minds (mostly Christians.)

I've consumed the work of the Illuminati through various means on the internet. When I came across their work, it really sparked my rational and critical thinking to be higher, to the point where I was able to recognize what was actually irrational, illusory, overly emotional, fear-driven, superstitious, objectively toxic and dividing bullshit in the religion of faith in which I grew-up – Christian fundamentalism.

I have not yet read the following books which are by members of the Illuminati, so if some word-choices, like "apple," happen to be used in a similar way: oopsie! I do have those three Mike Hockney books in my possession; I just haven't read through them yet. I've definitely read/heard bits and pieces of the books online somewhere.

Since the following books are by the Illuminati and are longer, I know they'll be more detailed and better than my little book.

"What Is a Thought?: The Ontology of Thinking" by Dr. Thomas Stark
www.scribd.com/book/479616580/What-Is-a-Thought-The-Ontology-of-Thinking

"The God Game" by Mike Hockney
www.scribd.com/book/311267521/The-God-Game

"Why Math Must Replace Science" by Mike Hockney
www.scribd.com/book/311544239/Why-Math-Must-Replace-Science

"The Case For Meritocracy" by Michael Faust
www.scribd.com/book/311351932/The-Case-for-Meritocracy

"The God Equation" by Mike Hockney
www.scribd.com/book/311624543/The-God-Equation

There are many more books to find by the Illuminati.



_________________________

The album download comes with image files for printing a CD package, and 2 text file formats that contain the theme expansion.